More of that Monopoly of Force Bullshit

So, some in this world would have the rest of us believe that the use of force should be restricted entirely to the dictates, proscriptions and whims of the government, including, but not limited to, the possession and use of firearms.

Fine, let's just take that argument at face value for a moment. Then, let's ask an important question; would that step, that's be disarming the public, result in the general populace being disarmed, that is, citizens and thugs alike, or would it only negatively impact the average Joe, with the criminal still able to easily get firearms through illegal channels, including insiders within the government which supposedly has the sole authority to the aforementiond use of force?

No doubt the fucktards have some sort of absurd "reasoning" behind all of this which, in their minds anyway, makes the whole mess go away.

I'm still waiting for a coherent argument.

H/T to David Codrea for the link.