Dictating your limits to freedom
Of note:
“As long as our citizens have available to them some types of weapons that are adequate reasonably to vindicate the right to bear arms in self-defense, the state may proscribe the possession of other weapons.” - Connecticut Supreme Court Chief Justice Ellen Peters
...and as commenter Phil Wilson perfectly suggests,
They intend to rule, in every sense of the word.
H/T to Mike at Sipsey Street.
“As long as our citizens have available to them some types of weapons that are adequate reasonably to vindicate the right to bear arms in self-defense, the state may proscribe the possession of other weapons.” - Connecticut Supreme Court Chief Justice Ellen Peters
...and as commenter Phil Wilson perfectly suggests,
"As Connecticut residents may communicate a range of ideas adequate to reasonably vindicate their right of Free Speech, the State may proscribe the expression of other, inappropriate sentiments.”And yes, the Libs ARE working on that too.
They intend to rule, in every sense of the word.
H/T to Mike at Sipsey Street.
Labels: Derision, Ethics, Governmental Hooliganism, Liberal stupidity, Orwellian nightmares, Politics, Unintended Consequences
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home