Dictating your limits to freedom

Of note:

“As long as our citizens have available to them some types of weapons that are adequate reasonably to vindicate the right to bear arms in self-defense, the state may proscribe the possession of other weapons.” - Connecticut Supreme Court Chief Justice Ellen Peters

...and as commenter Phil Wilson perfectly suggests,

"As Connecticut residents may communicate a range of ideas adequate to reasonably vindicate their right of Free Speech, the State may proscribe the expression of other, inappropriate sentiments.”

And yes, the Libs ARE working on that too.

They intend to rule, in every sense of the word.

H/T to Mike at Sipsey Street.

There will be blood

This isn't a case of forcing people to spend money, it's a disincentive to save.

ZERO investment is the result.

You go ahead and do it, Benny.

Can't wait.

I'm a bit perplexed

...As I'm stumbling around, foggy-headed, wondering where Alice went, where the White Rabbit is and trying to remember when it was that I fell through the looking glass, since I'm obviously in Wonderland or some other parallel universe and clearly NOT in reality.

I'm thinking that I might be getting some refugees in the not too distant future; the actual Germans.

Interesting times.

A modest proposal...

...only when YOU come to take them, Mr. and Mrs. Editorial Board.

I'm not liking your chances of actually pulling that one off.

Oh, another thing, sod off.

H/T to WRSA.